So I was reading an article recently about the cost-effectiveness of genetic testing for those at predisposed risks of certain diseases. The cost per test is relatively small, yet no-one in the NHS seems to think this is the case. Surely it is much easier to treat for example hyperlipidemia if it is diagnosed earlier (i.e. manage with statins rather than have to treat a heart attack!).
A recent BBC documentary also looks at the viability of genetic testing. To me it seems rather short-sighted to just dismiss these tests purely on (very poor) financial reasoning. Perhaps it is the ethics of trying to look into the future and have influence over future generations. Who knows, we may even do more harm than good if we remove cofactors which are otherwise of evolutionary significance.
I guess the documentary left me with a single question - would I want to know if I am going to get a genetic disorder later on in life?
My answer is probably no, unless I can then take measures to reduce its effect on me or eliminate it all together.
No comments:
Post a Comment